Tuesday, November 25, 2014

National Institute of Justice Says that Bad Perception of Police Comes from Personal Interactions with Police, Media, and the Discrimination of Different Groups

Police arrest a man in Ferguson, Mo., on Aug. 18
Photo from: www.nbcnews
In the past few months, there has been much talk about how all law enforcement are out in communities discriminating different groups of people. Specifically we are hearing much about the issues in Ferguson, Missouri. In Ferguson, where a white police officer shot a young black man, there has been much talk about how police officers are racist or try discriminate different groups of people. There are riots all over the city over the shooting of this young black man. This has led to many black and even white people all around the nation viewing police officers as "dirty." We now see the many people, especially in Ferguson, not respecting the authority of police, and view all law enforcement as unreliable and untrustworthy. Why do people have these views? The National Institute of Justice gives us three different thing that cause communities to perceive police as "dirty." The three things are police interactions, media, and discrimination.


Professor Christine White of the University of Maryland says that citizens perception of police mainly comes from personal interactions 


Personal interactions with police can be anything from a traffic stop, an interaction in a public place, or just a simple conversation. Not only will people perceive cops based on these types of interactions, but they will also view cops based on the interactions that close friends or family members have with them. If a family member has a bad interaction with a police officer then normally anyone that knows the individual personally will usually feel the same way. I asked Professor Christine White, a Criminal Justice Professor at the University of Maryland, her professional opinion on what she thinks is the main cause of why people view the police in a bad light. This was her response:






The public's personal interactions with law enforcement officers is the main cause of how a citizen will view the law. People will form their own opinion from a personal interaction or through an interaction of a close family member or friend. Citizens focus mainly on how the officer treats them. Regardless of the outcome of the interaction (ticket, etc) people just want to see the police treat them fair and respectful. Research shows that people tend to report more positively if the officer treats them fairly and with respect then if the officer was perceived to be rude or unfair toward that citizen. Citizens tend to act respectful toward law enforcement if they show them the same respect. The fact of the matter is that most people have had a bad interaction with the police. People tend to hold onto these incidents and discriminate all police officers as disrespectful, untrustworthy, or not fit for their job. 

She mentions that certain communities tend to have a bad perception based on different things. She mentioned as people age, then there trust levels tend to decrees. She says that certain groups, race, age, gender, etc., might view the police in a different manner than the other. For example, because of the issue in Ferguson, many black citizens are viewing white police as racist toward black people. National Institute of Justice along with Professor White says that the number one reason for how the public views law enforcement is based on their interactions.

The NIJ says that another cause of police perception is through what is heard in the media

The media is a big indicator on whether the public will perceive law enforcement with respect and trust. Most of the population sees what is being said on the news and believes in to be true, or at least have some truth to it. If the media is reporting an incident in which a police officer might have made a mistake,(Ferguson) then the public could look at that and think that all police officers are corrupt, even if not all of them are corrupt. For instance, if a Hispanic person lives in a area where there is a lot of crime and regularly hear about the misconduct of police toward Hispanics, then they are much more likely to believe that police misconduct occurs. Tuch and Weitzer(1997, p 642) analyzed data gathered before police brutality incidents and found that there was a decline in approval ratings following an incident of police brutality was reported through the media.


Another area of perceptions comes from the discrimination of different groups


Research says that minorities are found to be more likely to perceive the police in a bad way than whites. National Institute of Justice says that minorities more frequently report that police officers treated them unfairly based on their race or ethnicity. Racial minority perceptions that the police lack legitimacy could lead to a great deal of distrust in a society. Even though data shows that whites are more likely to view  police in a better light, race has not been found to directly influence the way people 
form their views on law enforcement. Researchers conclude that race affects satisfaction with the police indirectly in addiction to other factors like the level of crime in a neighborhood. Black people perceive the police as discriminating against them white whites no not see the discrimination against black people as a major problem. These statistics show that there is a separation between certain communities and law enforcement. 


Thursday, October 16, 2014

Comparison of Digital News Consumption in Germany, UK and Spain

By Ryan46 and Anthony13

Background

The Reuters Institute for the Study of Journalism at the University of Oxford recently published their digital news report for 2014. After reading and analyzing the content within the study, we decided to present a comprehensive portrayal of digital news consumption in three European countries; Germany, UK and Spain.

Interest  in news by country

We looked at the interest of news in the UK, Germany, and Spain. Amongst these three categories, Germany was the leading country. In the study, 87% of the people said that they were interested in checking the news, which leaves the remaining 13% saying that they weren't very interested. When you look at the large scale, 87% percent is a large majority of the country. Spain fell right below Germany with a total of 73% saying that they were interested in checking the news. The UK was towards the bottom of the list with only 64% of the people saying they were interested. Out of all the countries studied, every country with regards to being interested in the news was above 60 percent.


The types of news that each country was interested in varied based on the country.

 In Germany, regional news seemed to be more important, which reflects the way that media and politics are structured in the country. In Germany, 51% said they they were interested in news about their region. In Spain we see that they are interested in their own country, which includes interest in art and culture. The UK had a wide variety of interest, the study they said that they were very interested in international news as well as local news about their town or city. The highest percentage of interest in all countries came from the news in their own country.


Interest in types of news by country

Across all the countries, television is still the primary method of interpreting news. TV news consumption is primarily conducted through news bulletins and 24 hour news channels. The study showed further that online news consumption was the second most prevalent form of news analysis. Online consumption can be understood to be through computer, mobile or tablet viewing of websites/apps. We see a low level importance placed on online news in Germany and France. While online sources are valued in Spain and US.


Smartphone vs. Tablet Consumption of News by Country

From the above graphic we saw that online news, which we understand to be relatively new, is an important method of gathering information. We wanted to get a more comprehensive view of digital media usage so we synthesized the information regarding social news consumption in Germany, Spain and the UK. We can gather a lot of info from this approach such as how there has been an increase in both smartphone and tablet usage for news in the past year and also that smartphones for all three countries are more predominant than tablets for news gathering. 






Tuesday, October 14, 2014

Irvin describes good interactivity





Saturday, October 4, 2014

Non-Power Users prefer Personalization, while Power Users prefer to Customize their webpages

Personalization is that the computer controls what the user observes, and customization is that the user chooses what he observes.


Personalization and customization are very important when we are talking about the interaction between a user and software. Web interface is very important and we want to discuss how customization and personalization affect this idea. An average person hearing the words customization and personalization may not recognize the difference between the two and may use them interchangeably. These words sound like they have the same basic idea, but they are completely different. Personalization is a vital part of the user experience. Personalization is the idea that when the webpages adapt to the user without the user going out of his way to make any changes. The number of personalization variants seems countless today. An example of personalization is when Netflix gives you a related movie option after you watch one. When you watch a horror movie Netflix gives you other popular horror movies that are related to the one you just watched. Netflix also does that for television series so you do not have to search hard for the next episode. This gives the user the ability to select the next thing he wants without going out of his way. On the other hand, customization is the concept of the user actively changing and modifying the user interface based on their own preference. A good example of customization on web interface is Facebook and twitter. On these sites you can customize your profiles to the way you desire. You can have different themes and you can customize the settings the way you desire them. Another good example is our website we are currently using, blogger. Customization places what the user sees in the users’ hands. Personalization places the website in control of what the user sees. Agency gives the user the freedom to make their own decisions. Customization gives the user the ability to have agency because they get to customize the website the way they desire. Personalization does not truly give the user agency because the user does not make the changes on his own, they just happen.

Power users prefer Customization of a webpage, while Non-power users prefer Personalization of a webpage  


I found that the most interesting facts were from study one in this article. The study was what the difference between responses from non-power users and power users and how they favor personalization or customization on the internet. In the study, 82 participants were exposed to the standard view of the Google News Website. The participants were asked to browse the website for 15 minutes in two separate sessions. The participants were exposed to the website through the control variable, personalization version, or customized version.












Skilled power users prefer Customization of their webpages, while average non-power users prefer personalization of their webpages.


We find that power users prefer customization on the web and non-power users prefer personalization. A power user would be someone that is a professional in the world of research. They would be the ones who are professionals at video editing, graphic designing, audio producers, and those who do scientific research. These people also have the newest and most quality devices. Whereas a non-power user is someone who just uses there computers for normal things like basic web browsing, email, social media, and paper writing.


There is a major difference between power users and non-power users. The difference between these two help us understand why they would choose one kind of version over the others. Why do power-users prefer customization over personalization? Because power users know everything about their computers and about research so they can easily customize their computers and research techniques way better than the computer would ever be able to because of their technological knowledge in these areas. For non-power users they probably would never want to customize their own computers because they would not even know how to use it. These people rely on the personalization of their computers in order to use the internet effectively. I would put myself in the non-power user category because having to customize my own webpage seem like too much for me.  This is why personalizing something seems more preferred for non-power users when given the choice for making a web page or their computer more personal.